<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for La-Legal Blog</title>
	<link>http://www.la-legal.com/modules/wordpress</link>
	<description>Louisiana Law Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 13:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Good Old Boy? by Lex</title>
		<link>http://www.la-legal.com/modules/wordpress/2011/01/18/good-old-boy/#comment-7</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.la-legal.com/modules/wordpress/2011/01/18/good-old-boy/#comment-7</guid>
					<description>I do believe Edwards was disbarred some years ago.

I also do believe the LA Supreme Court has decided several years ago that a disbarred lawyer may not be employed by a law firm in ANY capacity. Not ever to sweep the floors.

It will be interesting to see how this plays out -or if it does play out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do believe Edwards was disbarred some years ago.</p>
<p>I also do believe the LA Supreme Court has decided several years ago that a disbarred lawyer may not be employed by a law firm in ANY capacity. Not ever to sweep the floors.</p>
<p>It will be interesting to see how this plays out -or if it does play out.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Good Old Boy? by qariellew</title>
		<link>http://www.la-legal.com/modules/wordpress/2011/01/18/good-old-boy/#comment-6</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 20:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.la-legal.com/modules/wordpress/2011/01/18/good-old-boy/#comment-6</guid>
					<description>Personally, I'm glad to see him back under any circumstances. I think a lot of people think he got a raw deal and if old friends want to help him out, especially at their expense, then all the better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I&#8217;m glad to see him back under any circumstances. I think a lot of people think he got a raw deal and if old friends want to help him out, especially at their expense, then all the better.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dumb Lawyer of the Month Award by Gamaliel Ben Joseph</title>
		<link>http://www.la-legal.com/modules/wordpress/2011/01/03/dumb-lawyer-of-the-month-award/#comment-5</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 18:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.la-legal.com/modules/wordpress/2011/01/03/dumb-lawyer-of-the-month-award/#comment-5</guid>
					<description>Dumb or greedy in any case lack of personal values and integrity is root all such down falls,surely he didn\'t\' value his name</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dumb or greedy in any case lack of personal values and integrity is root all such down falls,surely he didn\&#8217;t\&#8217; value his name
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Estate Taxes - What the Changes Mean For You by Lex</title>
		<link>http://www.la-legal.com/modules/wordpress/2010/12/23/estate-taxes-what-the-changes-mean-for-you/#comment-4</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 16:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.la-legal.com/modules/wordpress/2010/12/23/estate-taxes-what-the-changes-mean-for-you/#comment-4</guid>
					<description>Here is another issue that is unclear: if the first spouse dies with the exemption is $5 million, does he or she get the full exemption or just the amount of the estate reported on the return? In other words, if somebody dies in 2011 with a $1 million estate and a return is filed claiming the &quot;unused exemption&quot;, does that mean $1 million or $5 million goes to the surviving spouse?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is another issue that is unclear: if the first spouse dies with the exemption is $5 million, does he or she get the full exemption or just the amount of the estate reported on the return? In other words, if somebody dies in 2011 with a $1 million estate and a return is filed claiming the &#8220;unused exemption&#8221;, does that mean $1 million or $5 million goes to the surviving spouse?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Estate Taxes - What the Changes Mean For You by Lex</title>
		<link>http://www.la-legal.com/modules/wordpress/2010/12/23/estate-taxes-what-the-changes-mean-for-you/#comment-3</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 17:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.la-legal.com/modules/wordpress/2010/12/23/estate-taxes-what-the-changes-mean-for-you/#comment-3</guid>
					<description>Yes, good point.

The IRS will be swamped with 706 returns to satisfy the weak legislation that Congress has foisted on us.

I will probably do something along the lines that you are suggesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, good point.</p>
<p>The IRS will be swamped with 706 returns to satisfy the weak legislation that Congress has foisted on us.</p>
<p>I will probably do something along the lines that you are suggesting.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Estate Taxes - What the Changes Mean For You by BassMaster</title>
		<link>http://www.la-legal.com/modules/wordpress/2010/12/23/estate-taxes-what-the-changes-mean-for-you/#comment-2</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 17:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.la-legal.com/modules/wordpress/2010/12/23/estate-taxes-what-the-changes-mean-for-you/#comment-2</guid>
					<description>As a lawyer, I think I would be inclined to get some software to cookie-cutter basic estate tax returns for small estates. The purpose would simply be to make the election for the exemption and nothing else. The \&quot;nothing else\&quot; would be made clear to the client and I would be able to charge a much smaller fee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a lawyer, I think I would be inclined to get some software to cookie-cutter basic estate tax returns for small estates. The purpose would simply be to make the election for the exemption and nothing else. The \&#8221;nothing else\&#8221; would be made clear to the client and I would be able to charge a much smaller fee.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

